But seriously folks, this show is shaping up to be yet another misfire on the WWE PPV calendar. Last year's Survivor Series (Bragging Rights) was an unexpected gem, despite being built around a forced, completely phony RAW vs. Smackdown rivalry, plus a 90-second main event. The reason it worked so well was the booking and execution of the three elimination matches, which comprised the vast majority of the PPV. Survivor Series 2016 turned out to be, in my opinion, the best main roster show of the year. Had they followed that same formula they could've potentially repeated that feat and delivered the best pair of back-to-back Survivor Series since the original two (The '87 and '88 editions are still two of my favorite all-time PPVs). But as we found out last night, we'll be going back to the watered down version of the concept, with only two elimination matches and four Champion vs. Champion bouts, only one of which has much intrigue.
![]() |
| Jeezus, they might add this match too.... |
I've already talked HERE about how idiotic and terrible this Brock vs. Jinder (May-haul, according to Kurt Angle) match is gonna be. This here is what you'd call a no-win situation. Mahal is in no way qualified to hang with Brock and either guy jobbing to the other is bad for that guy's belt. But let's look at the other three matches that have been announced:
Alexa Bliss vs. Natalya has potential to be a good in-ring contest, but with two heels fighting each other, who are the fans supposed to be rooting for? Heel vs. heel matches almost never work from a crowd perspective. They aren't invested in either participant, so they end up sitting on their hands the whole time and the match falls flat. And women's matches lately have had a hard time keeping the live crowds attentive as it is, what with their often less-than-ideal placement on the show and main roster creative's complete ineptitude in presenting compelling feuds in that division (or any other for that matter) - look no further than Bayley's recent nosedive in popularity for example. How do you make fans boo the most likable babyface on the roster? Alexa vs. Nattie is a fresh matchup and both women are talented, but without anything to root for I don't see this going well.
The Miz vs. Baron Corbin. You gotta be shitting me with this. First off, see what I said above about heel vs. heel matches. Now you're booking TWO of them on this show? Miz is way over as a douchebag upper midcard heel. Baron Corbin is not. Which of these guys do you think the fans will be cheering here (if they cheer anyone at all)? You're gonna have a guy with great "love to hate him" heat getting cheered against a guy with "go away" heat. Not to mention The Miz's matches are only as good as his opponents. Last year against Sami Zayn he had a solid outing, because Zayn is great, and The Miz's in-ring strength has always been his ability to follow the other guy's lead. Corbin on the other hand is mostly Sycho Sid-bad in the ring. If you think The Miz will be up to the challenge of pulling a great match out of him you're very much mistaken. This is going to be piss-poor.











































